Exploring Students' Perspectives on the Use of Grammarly in Writing Analytical Exposition Text
Abstract
This study explores the students' perspectives of Grammarly and its effectiveness in improving their writing skills. Using a mixed methods approach with 60 participants (53% male, 47% female), the research collected quantitative data through a questionnaire distributed via Google Form and qualitative data through interviews with nine students. Integrating quantitative and qualitative findings revealed a generally positive view of Grammarly. Quantitative findings show that 63% of students found Grammarly useful, and 72% agreed that Grammarly feedback significantly improved their writing quality. Additionally, 52% of students appreciated detailed feedback, and 63% reported that Grammarly helped them better understand grammar rules. In relation to the perceived use of ease, the study revealed that 55% of students found Grammarly easy to use, and 61% agreed that Grammarly provided clear feedback on errors. Qualitative data confirms these findings, highlighting Grammarly's effectiveness in correcting mistakes, enhancing grammar understanding, and increasing students writing confidence. Students also valued Grammarly as being easy to use and allowing them to simplify the writing process, save time, and make writing tasks more manageable. However, some of Grammarly's advanced features require a paid premium subscription, which may be an obstacle for some users. The study concludes that integrating technology with Grammarly in EFL writing instruction offers significant benefits, including increased confidence in writing, better understanding of Grammarly, and efficient feedback.
Downloads
References
Bungsu, O. P., Daud, A., & Masyhur, M. (2021). An analysis on students’ grammatical errors in writing degrees of comparison. Indonesian Journal of Economics, Social, and Humanities, 3(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijesh.3.1.55-63
Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 10(1), 223. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320618419
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods procedures. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Conducting mixed methods research. Beyond Bullying, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315858555-16
Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students’ perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315
Fahmi, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). EFL students’ perception on the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.849
Fither, Ammade, S., & Amaluddin. (2023). Bilingualism effect in the English learning process (Study at SMA 3 Tana-Toraja). JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 4(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v4i02.2321
Fitria, R. A., Sabarun, S., & Miftah, M. Z. (2022). Students’ perception of the use of Grammarly in undergraduate thesis writing. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 5(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v5i2.p366-371
Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
Fitriana, K., & Nurazni, L. (2022). Exploring students’ perception of using Grammarly to check grammar in their writing. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3044
Ghufron, M. A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The role of Grammarly in assessing English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4582
Hartina, S. (2023). Telegram bot as digital learning medium of writing: The impact on students’ writing performance. Journal of Learning Education, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v1i2
Hashim, H. (2021). The use of technology in teaching of writing among Malaysian ESL. International Journal of Education, 7(3), 314–330.
Huang, H.-W., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The effectiveness of using Grammarly to improve students’ writing skills. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 122–127). https://doi.org/10.1145/3402569.3402594
Jelita, K. N., & Daud, A. (2023). The effectiveness of using Grammarly on high school students’ writing quality. International Journal of English and Business Practice, 7(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.32851/ijebp.v7n1.p43-55
Lazic, D., Thompson, A., Pritchard, T., & Tsuji, S. (2020). Student preferences: Using Grammarly to help EFL writers with paraphrasing, summarizing, and synthesizing. CALL for Widening Participation: Short Papers from EUROCALL 2020, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.48.1186
Maulidina, P., & Wibowo, H. (2022). The use of Grammarly tools to enrich students’ writing ability. Lingua, 18(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v18i2.2246
O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Park, J. (2019). An AI-based English grammar checker vs. human raters in evaluating EFL learners’ writing. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 112–131. http://journal.kamall.or.kr/wp-content/uploads/2019/3/Park_22_1_04.pdf
Pramono, S. A. (2019). A systemic functional linguistics-based analysis of students’ problems in writing exposition text. In Proceedings of the Conaplin 2018 (pp. 131–135). https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.27
Pratama, Y. D. (2020). The investigation of using Grammarly as online grammar checker in the process of writing. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 46–54.
Rahma Hakiki, G. N. (2021). Perception of EFL students on the use of Grammarly application in writing class. Eduvelop, 4(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v4i2.891
Sajjadpour, N. (2021). How Grammarly® website influences the Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 22, 119–139. https://doi.org/10.32038/LTRQ.2021.22.09
Samosir, S. A., & Daulay, S. H. (2023). EFL students’ perception of the use “Grammarly application” as automated writing evaluation (AWE). International Journal of English and Business Practice, 1(2), 928–940.
Shadiev, R., & Feng, Y. (2023). Using automated corrective feedback tools in language learning: A review study. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2153145
Susiana, E., & Yolanda, A. (2024). Students’ perception on the use of “Grammarly” in thesis writing at Nahdlatul Ulama University. Journal of Linguistics and Education, 2(3), 71–79.
Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022). How teacher and Grammarly feedback complement one another in Myanmar EFL students’ writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2
Toba, R., Noor, W. N., & Sanu, L. O. (2019). The current issues of Indonesian EFL students’ writing skills: Ability, problem, and reason in writing comparison and contrast essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506
Wibawa, H. T., & Nabhan, S. (2023). The use of “Grammarly” application as AI-powered writing assistant: University students’ perception. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Literature, and Teaching (pp. 131–143).
Copyright (c) 2024 Tarisa Marta Inayah, Tri Wintolo Apoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
