Friend or Fraud? Exploring Foreign Language Students’ Awareness of AI-Generated Content
Abstract
This study aims to explore the awareness of students majoring in Arabic Language Education and English Language Education at Ahmad Dahlan Islamic University, Sinjai, regarding content generated by artificial intelligence (AI). In today's digital era, many students utilize AI tools to complete academic assignments, but not all are aware of the difference between human-generated and machine-generated content. This study employed a quantitative method with a survey approach, involving 42 students. Data were collected through online questionnaire with Likert scale and were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques, including mean scores and percentage distributions. The result showed that students were quite familiar with the use of AI, especially for translation and grammar correction purposes. However, their level of awareness in critically evaluating AI-generated content, especially in distinguishing between human and machine-generated writing, was in the moderate category. From an ethical perspective, most respondents expressed a positive attitude towards the responsible use of AI in learning and rejected academic dishonesty practices involving the unethical use of AI content. These results suggest that while AI functions as a “friend” by assisting language learning, it also has the potential to become a “fraud” when students lack sufficient critical awareness and ethical guidance. Overall, this study concludes that the role of AI in foreign language education depends largely on students’ critical awareness, ethical attitudes, and institutional guidance. Strengthening critical digital literacy and establishing clear academic policies are therefore essential to ensure responsible AI integration.
Downloads
References
Akbarani, R. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching. International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics (IJELAL), 4(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.21111/ijelal.v4i1.10756
Alexander, K., Savvidou, C., & Alexander, C. (2023). Who wrote this essay? Detecting AI-generated writing in second language education in higher education. Teaching English with Technology, 23(2), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.56297/BUKA4060/XHLD5365
Ali, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076
Awalin, A. S. A., Iftanti, E., & Umami, M. S. M. (2023). Students’ perceptions on the impact of artificial intelligence on English grammar learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education (Vol. 1, pp. 169–174).
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Hossain, Z., Çelik, Ö., & Hınız, G. (2025). Exploring EFL students’ AI literacy in academic writing: Insights into familiarity, knowledge, and ethical perceptions. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 18(1), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1538011
Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024). “AI, will you help?” How learners use artificial intelligence when writing. XLinguae, 17(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.03
Laili, R. N., Wirawati, W. A., & Nashir, M. (2025). Students’ perception on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) ChatGPT in English language learning: Benefits and challenges in higher education. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(3), 1389–1403. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i03.5272
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V., Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in academic writing in English as a foreign language. Education Sciences, 15(5), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050611
Premkumar, P., Yatigammana, K., & Kannagara, S. (2024). Impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills in undergraduates: A systematic review. The Journal of Desk Research Review and Analysis, 2(1), 199–215.
Qiao, H., & Zhao, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based language learning: Illuminating the impact on speaking skills and self-regulation in the Chinese EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1255594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255594
Rudnik, Y., Petryk, L., Kosharna, N., Dzhurylo, A., & Popova, L. (2024). Students’ awareness considering the academic integrity of artificial intelligence use in terms of foreign language acquisition. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society (BRAJETS), 17(3), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse3.50-60
Sabaruddin, P., Purnama, A. D., Harmilawati, Aminah, S., Irmayani, Takdir, & Amran. (2024). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: A study of English teachers’ TPACK. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education and Culture, 13(2).
Sugiyono. (2018). Penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suharti, D. S., & Sutikno, E. U. (2019). The needs of assistive technology on students’ EFL writing. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education and Culture, 8(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v8i2.1758
Torun, F., & Özer Şanal, S. (2025). The perspectives of academicians and students regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence in higher education. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.883
Copyright (c) 2025 Sitti Aminah, Akmal, Atmarani Dewi Purnama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2.png)

.png)


