Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Daring Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa
Abstract
This study aims to find out Are student mathematics learning outcomes in solving problems for students who have high learning independence better than those who have moderate learning independence, are student mathematics learning outcomes in solving questions for students who have high learning independence are better than those who have low learning independence and whether the mathematics learning outcomes of students in solving problems for students who have moderate learning independence are better than those who have low learning independence. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of the mathematics education study program in the even semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. Samples were taken by random sampling. The instruments used in data collection were learning independence questionnaires and learning achievement tests in solving questions in the form of descriptions. Before Questionnaires and tests are used for data collection before being tested to determine validity and reliability. Hypothesis testing using anava two different cell lines, with a significance level of 5%. Previously, the average balance test and prerequisite tests were carried out involving the normality test and homogeneity test. The average balance test uses the t test while the normality test uses the Liliefors test which concerns the normality of the experimental group, control group, independence high learning, moderate learning independence and low learning independence. The homogeneity test uses the Barlett test which concerns learning strategies and learning independence
Downloads
References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Artino, A. R. (2016). Self-regulated learning in online education: A review of the empirical literature. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (4th ed., pp. 131–145). Routledge.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Budiyono. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Press
Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: Importance and confidence. Online Learning, 24(2), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2053
Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for e-learning in northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0034-x
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2020). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/4493
Wang, Y., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2021). Students’ characteristics and self-directed learning readiness in online learning environments. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 40(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1897630
Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2021). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 165, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104121
Yates, A., Partridge, H., & Bruce, C. (2015). Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Library and Information Research, 39(121), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg684
Zhu, M., & Liu, T. (2020). Student engagement and learning outcome in online mathematics courses: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 159, 104022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104022
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2025 Heny Sri Astutik, Abdul Rahman, Nurwati Djam’an

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

11.png)
11.png)
11.png)
2.png)
