Implementasi Cybergogy untuk Pembelajaran PAI yang Bermakna

Umar; Jamaluddin

doi:10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1840

Umar Universitas Islam Ahmad Dahlan
Jamaluddin Universitas Islam Ahmad Dahlan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1840

Keywords: cybergogy, PAI learning implementation, meaningful learning

Abstract

This paper aims to review the literature to propose a meaningful PAI learning paradigm in the context of cybergogy learning interaction. The demands of ICT needs and the meaningfulness of learning increasingly urge innovation and futuristic learning reconstruction. Empirically, since the Covid-19 pandemic passed, the challenges of PAI learning do not only include the planning, implementation and evaluation of blended learning but also the meaningfulness of learning interactions to achieve the expected goals. The cybergogy model carries aspects of knowledge (cognitive), social and emotional interestingly tracing its conceptual relevance, adaptation and implementation in learning PAI meaningfully. In addition to achieve the goal of meaningfulness of PAI learning, it is also expected to create a comfortable online learning (good online learner) in the integration of digital technology. This paper is developed through the method of reviewing relevant literature from various scientific sources with a literature approach, the data is collected and analyzed descriptively and then a paradigm is proposed that is worthy of being informed and proposed as a finding. Concept of cybergogy is actually relevant to be implemented in PAI learning, having a connection of concepts and principles to create meaningful learning, emphasizing cognitive engagement, strengthening social and emotional values of students. The meaningful PAI learning and the context of cybergogy emphasize careful interaction, namely the identification of various relevant contexts, the learning objectives are achieved comprehensively, namely the development of knowledge and continuous emotional and social growth in line with Islamic teachings. In addition, it is necessary to pay attention to pedagogical and technical principles, holistic and integrative approaches, so that they can be widely considered for learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashburn, E. A., & Floden, R. E. (2006). Meaningful Learning Using Technology: What Educators Need to Know and Do (Technology, Education-Connections The TEC Series). In Teacher College Press.

Balbay, S., & Kilis, S. (2017). channel specifically designed for an Academic. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 235–251.

Bandur, A. (2016). Penelitian Kualitatif Metodologi, Desain, dan Teknik Analisis Data dengan NVIVO 11 Plus (edited by M. W (ed.)). Media.

Creswell, W. . (2012). Educational Research, Planning, Conductin and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative (Four Edition). Person.

Degeng, I. N. S. (1990). Desain Pendidikan; Teori Ke Terapan. Penyelenggara Pendidikan Pascasarjana IKIP Malang.

Degeng, I. N. S. (2013). Ilmu Pembelajaran: Klasifikasi Variabel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian. Aras Media.

Hilmi, A. M. Bin. (2021). Keperluan Aplikasi Digital Pengajian Qirā’ātmenerusi Pendekatan Cybergogi Dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0. In Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on Quran as Foundation of Civilization (SWAT 2021) (Issue October, pp. 6–7). http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14406

Hude, M. D. (2018). Mengemas Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam yang Bermakna. Qiro’ah, 1(1), 25–43.

Jazeel, A. M. (2020). A Study on Perception of Teacher Trainees on Cybergogy in Sri Lankan Government Teachers’ Training Colleges. In Journal of Social Welfare and Management (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Am-Jazeel/publication/344650171

Jirde, A., & Arifin, A. G. (2022). Challenges Facing Somali Islamic Education Teachers in Implementing 21st Century Teaching Approaches. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 10(1), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v10i1.429

John, K., Galarosa, D., Tan, D. A., & Tan, D. A. (2022). Students’ Academic Performance and Motivation in Physics Using a Microlearning Approach Via Cybergogy Learning Environment. Sci. Int.(Lahore), 34(2), 157–170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360561820

Joshi, A. (2021). Understanding ‘5 Gogy’: Pedagogy, Andragogy, Peeragogy, Heutagogy, And Cybergogy (Cummins College Bulletin on Engineering Education, Issue December 2021).

Joyce, B., Marsha, W., & Calhoun, E. (2003). Models of Teaching (Fifth Edition). Indian, Reprint.

Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). External Representation of Learning Process and Domain Knowledge: Affective State as a Determinate of its Structure and Function. AI-ED 2001 Workshop External Representations in AIED: Multiple Forms and Multiple Roles, May, 1–6.

Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092

Maisaroh, S., Muthiah, & Siagian, N. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Al-Ulum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 1–13. https://jurnal.stitalishlahbondowoso.ac.id/ index.php/tsaqofah/article/view/86/77

Malek, A. J., & Tahir, Z. (2018). Telecenters in the Development of the Smart Village (SV): Cybergogy for Multicultural Transformation. 147(Icsse 2017), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsse-17.2018.37

Mayers, K. L. (1999). Is There a Place for Instructional Design in the Information Age? Educational Technology, 39(6), 50–53.

Muhaimin. (2002). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam Upaya Mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah (II). Rosdakarya.

Muresan, M. (2014). Using Cybergogy and Andragogy Paradigms in Lifelong Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4722–4726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1015

Nasution, S. (2019). Strategi Guru dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 147 Palembang. Darul ’Ilmi, 07(02), 68–79.

Novia, W., & Wasehudin, W. (2021). Dampak Pandemi Covid Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Mata Pelajaran Pai. TARBAWY : Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, 8(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.17509/t.v8i1.28551

Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2002). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5

Pawestri, Z. (2012). Pembelajaran PAI dalam Kerangka Pendidikan Nilai Edt. Khamdan, Stratrgi Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah (Teori, Metodologi dan Implementasi). Idea Press.

Rabiman, R., Sudira, P., Sofyan, H., & Nurtanto, M. (2021). Practical Learning Media in Subject Maintenance of Chassis and Power (MCP) Based Online: Simple Learning Using Videos on YouTube. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(3), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i03.14943

Rachmawati, G. A., & Subekti, H. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Pengembangan Sikap Toleransi dengan Menggunakan Strategi Cybergogy. Pendidikan Sains, 10(3), 409–417. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa

Rahayu, S., & Kejora, B. M. (2022). Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Pembelajaran Online di Masa Pandemic Covid 19. Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.36232/pendidikan.v10i1.1253

Rahma, R. A., Sucipto, Affriyenni, Y., & Widyaswari, M. (2021). Cybergogy as a digital media to facilitate the learning style of millennial college students. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5691

Ramadan, D., Yulianti, I., Rizal, M. I., & Ikhsanuddin, I. (2022). Pendidikan era cybergogy: Bagaimana strategi guru profesional untuk menghadapinya? Vocational Education National Seminar (VENS) Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Some Rights Reserved, 1(1), 71–76.

Sadjim, U. M., & Jusuf, R. (2021). Cybergogy and Heutagogy Learning based on Ternate Local Wisdom for Elementary School Students’ Character Education. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(2), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i2.10179

Setyosari, P. (2014). Menciptakan Pembelajaran Yang Efektif Dan Berkualitas. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran) Kajian Dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(5), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v1i12014p020

Sogianor; Syahrani. (2022). Model Pembelajaran PAI di Sekolah Sebelum, Saat, dan Sesudah Pandemi. Educatioanl Journal: General and Specific Research, 2(1), 113–124.

Sumarsono. (2020). The paradigms of heutagogy and cybergogy in the transdisciplinary perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 52(3), 172–182

Suyuti, H., Fitriyana, S., & Farida, E. Y. (2021). Teknologi Pembelajaran Pai. Al-Iltizam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 6(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.33477/alt.v6i2.2444

Umar, U., & Nimah, S. (2020). Revitalisasi Iptek Modern Dalam Gagasan Ilmuan Dan Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Al-Mubarak: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 5(1), 30-50.

Umar, U. (2017). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Dari Berbasis Ict Ke Di Era Big Data, Reorientasi Pembelajaran Pai Dalam Paradigma Konstruktivisme. Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan, 9(1), 160-177.

Umar, U., & Ismail, I. (2021, September). Learning Construction of Students of Prospective Teacher Based on Digital Literacy in the Era of Pandemic Covid-19. In Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311617

Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2008). Cybergogy for engaged learning. Journal of Open and Distance Education in China, 14(2), 14–22.